inherit
559
0
Jan 8, 2016 22:33:16 GMT 8
12
bloop26
First tourney win 25/05/13 :P
288
Oct 4, 2012 9:04:53 GMT 8
October 2012
bloop26
|
Post by bloop26 on May 13, 2013 9:16:32 GMT 8
well then most people wont be playing those superstars with shitty abilities and white wedding just to counter andre right?
And you need to change your nick how many times...
|
|
inherit
Xiao Yuan~~~
321
0
Jan 31, 2013 7:38:11 GMT 8
9
LordFa9
I miss the days when a man's word was his unbreakable oath
768
Feb 29, 2012 15:23:44 GMT 8
February 2012
lordfa9
|
Post by LordFa9 on May 13, 2013 16:19:01 GMT 8
First thing: WHY SO MUCH TALK BUT ONLY 3 PPL VOTE? I understand that not everyone live in Aljunid or Potong Pasir but when you have a say, use it! (<- totally a cheap pop) I prefer full virtual classics because IAATG can kill half of the virtual superstars because IAATG isn't even really usable in the virtual requirement due to their staples, thus the virtual superstar specific pre matches are made to be 100% played and a big part of the game plan. Not forgetting how Kennedy and Roddy will be providing with so much npe without virtual staples to hold them down. likely there will be a banlist released closer to the date, so don't worry about Andre/Piper/Kennedy Personally I think classic would be better since we are still new to virtual. I'd really rather prefer month or so then is Virtual Classic BUT IF EVERYONE AGREE then I see no problem with changing the format. Hopefully those who not used to Virtual can pitch in to make themself heard. It will be quite sad if on tourney day those who turn up with classic deck get rolled well then most people wont be playing those superstars with shitty abilities and white wedding just to counter andre right? And you need to change your nick how many times... Better than those who delete their acc, then recreate new one and pretend to be someone else
|
|
inherit
559
0
Jan 8, 2016 22:33:16 GMT 8
12
bloop26
First tourney win 25/05/13 :P
288
Oct 4, 2012 9:04:53 GMT 8
October 2012
bloop26
|
Post by bloop26 on May 13, 2013 16:49:13 GMT 8
First thing: WHY SO MUCH TALK BUT ONLY 3 PPL VOTE? I understand that not everyone live in Aljunid or Potong Pasir but when you have a say, use it! (<- totally a cheap pop) I prefer full virtual classics because IAATG can kill half of the virtual superstars because IAATG isn't even really usable in the virtual requirement due to their staples, thus the virtual superstar specific pre matches are made to be 100% played and a big part of the game plan. Not forgetting how Kennedy and Roddy will be providing with so much npe without virtual staples to hold them down. likely there will be a banlist released closer to the date, so don't worry about Andre/Piper/Kennedy Personally I think classic would be better since we are still new to virtual. I'd really rather prefer month or so then is Virtual Classic Maybe you can 2 leagues? since we have a fair amount of people interested, have a classic and virtual classic tourny running simultaneously? will be a lot more work but may suit everyone's palate better. so the newer guys can play the classic and the rest virtual? haha idk just suggesting.
BUT IF EVERYONE AGREE then I see no problem with changing the format. Hopefully those who not used to Virtual can pitch in to make themself heard. It will be quite sad if on tourney day those who turn up with classic deck get rolled well then most people wont be playing those superstars with shitty abilities and white wedding just to counter andre right? And you need to change your nick how many times... Better than those who delete their acc, then recreate new one and pretend to be someone else hahaha that's kinda true
|
|
inherit
238
0
Feb 17, 2014 11:28:07 GMT 8
7
tiochaota
537
Dec 7, 2011 20:56:38 GMT 8
December 2011
tiochaota
|
Post by tiochaota on May 13, 2013 17:46:47 GMT 8
jerishow really too strong liao haha where can say like that...
|
|
inherit
559
0
Jan 8, 2016 22:33:16 GMT 8
12
bloop26
First tourney win 25/05/13 :P
288
Oct 4, 2012 9:04:53 GMT 8
October 2012
bloop26
|
Post by bloop26 on May 13, 2013 18:00:42 GMT 8
jerishow really too strong liao haha where can say like that... Your Superstar-specific non-hybrid reversals are F: 0 (combo of jericho and big show reversals) , and ignore the “Can only be played…” text on your Superstar-specific maneuvers (what in the worlddddd!). You may pack Raw & Smackdown cards....(oh man) and, The Best in the World at what we do Double numbers on title belts ( ), maneuvers +2d ( (( ), opp's pre and mid -2 and dmg -2 (are you frking serious???) it's like your ability alr freaking strong then still got his event like OMG sia
|
|
inherit
238
0
Feb 17, 2014 11:28:07 GMT 8
7
tiochaota
537
Dec 7, 2011 20:56:38 GMT 8
December 2011
tiochaota
|
Post by tiochaota on May 13, 2013 19:03:08 GMT 8
where can say like that... Your Superstar-specific non-hybrid reversals are F: 0 (combo of jericho and big show reversals) , and ignore the “Can only be played…” text on your Superstar-specific maneuvers (what in the worlddddd!). You may pack Raw & Smackdown cards....(oh man) and, The Best in the World at what we do Double numbers on title belts ( ), maneuvers +2d ( (( ), opp's pre and mid -2 and dmg -2 (are you frking serious???) it's like your ability alr freaking strong then still got his event like OMG sia where can say like that..
|
|
inherit
The Hipster of Hipster
266
0
1
Jun 6, 2022 17:51:57 GMT 8
91
DebuRaito
Royal Rumble 2018
450
Jan 7, 2012 22:21:48 GMT 8
January 2012
deburaito
|
Post by DebuRaito on May 13, 2013 20:11:40 GMT 8
I think Jeri-Show is very strong but not overpowered. in virtual a lot off ppl have their specifics as free slot or can find ways to play a lot of pre matches. Furthermore, it has been bump to a 6/6 ring rule in virtual classic, so a decrease in 2 may be irritating but not imbalance. For the ability to pack both Raw and Smackdown, I also haven't seen a vince mcmahon abusing his ability to pack different brands card effectively. The specific reversals at F:0 is gay but just think of it as another revo in his hand lor. Nowadays ppl only play maneuvers like german suplex or boot lace or diva moves etc aka protected maneuvers, or just run through with chain, so nothing changes really drastically. Most of all, Jeri-Show needs the luck of a draw because they don't have any searching cards. (this can proof to be quite a nuisance at times when luck just isn't on your side)
|
|
inherit
The Hipster of Hipster
266
0
1
Jun 6, 2022 17:51:57 GMT 8
91
DebuRaito
Royal Rumble 2018
450
Jan 7, 2012 22:21:48 GMT 8
January 2012
deburaito
|
Post by DebuRaito on May 13, 2013 20:15:16 GMT 8
I don't mind pure non-virtual classic either. Or we can make it as our final non-virtual classic tourney to bring the chapter to a close and open up to a new full virtual environment. Although I had prefer to have a virtual tourney. Haha!
|
|
inherit
Wrestlemania Maineventer
170
0
Jul 9, 2017 1:55:02 GMT 8
41
ThE AuThORitY
708
Aug 20, 2011 22:15:23 GMT 8
August 2011
chrisl
|
Post by ThE AuThORitY on May 13, 2013 21:04:48 GMT 8
I think Jeri-Show is very strong but not overpowered. in virtual a lot off ppl have their specifics as free slot or can find ways to play a lot of pre matches. Furthermore, it has been bump to a 6/6 ring rule in virtual classic, so a decrease in 2 may be irritating but not imbalance. For the ability to pack both Raw and Smackdown, I also haven't seen a vince mcmahon abusing his ability to pack different brands card effectively. The specific reversals at F:0 is gay but just think of it as another revo in his hand lor. Nowadays ppl only play maneuvers like german suplex or boot lace or diva moves etc aka protected maneuvers, or just run through with chain, so nothing changes really drastically. Most of all, Jeri-Show needs the luck of a draw because they don't have any searching cards. (this can proof to be quite a nuisance at times when luck just isn't on your side) Or play a one-break plan..jerishow GG. haha
|
|
inherit
The Hipster of Hipster
266
0
1
Jun 6, 2022 17:51:57 GMT 8
91
DebuRaito
Royal Rumble 2018
450
Jan 7, 2012 22:21:48 GMT 8
January 2012
deburaito
|
Post by DebuRaito on May 13, 2013 21:50:50 GMT 8
Sorry to disappoint you but Break had been nerve. Better think twice before doing reckless stuff. If Jeri-Show can be so easily GGed by 1 commonly packed card, I wouldn't say he is very strong already. At least he is much more reliable than a Flunder dog Edge hitting Glass ceiling without a back up plan.
Night of Champions Pre-match Pay-Per-View Event This card does not take up a Pre-match slot in your Ring. Your Starting Hand Size is +1. The number of Pre-match cards in your Ring is considered -4 for your opponent's I'm Gonna Break You and the number of Title Belts in your Ring is considered -1 for Fans Love an Underdog. F: 0 D: 0 Unique
|
|
inherit
Wrestlemania Maineventer
170
0
Jul 9, 2017 1:55:02 GMT 8
41
ThE AuThORitY
708
Aug 20, 2011 22:15:23 GMT 8
August 2011
chrisl
|
Post by ThE AuThORitY on May 13, 2013 22:18:00 GMT 8
Sorry to disappoint you but Break had been nerve. Better think twice before doing reckless stuff. If Jeri-Show can be so easily GGed by 1 commonly packed card, I wouldn't say he is very strong already. At he is least much more reliable than a Flunder dog Edge hitting Glass ceiling without a back up plan. Night of Champions Pre-match Pay-Per-View Event This card does not take up a Pre-match slot in your Ring. Your Starting Hand Size is +1. The number of Pre-match cards in your Ring is considered -4 for your opponent's I'm Gonna Break You and the number of Title Belts in your Ring is considered -1 for Fans Love an Underdog. F: 0 D: 0 Unique .......................................................... -.-
|
|
inherit
601
0
Nov 2, 2016 21:52:13 GMT 8
26
J.C.
"I will give you a show that you have never ever seen before..why?...Because I can." Shawn Michaels
607
Dec 19, 2012 3:53:34 GMT 8
December 2012
josephclifford
|
Post by J.C. on May 13, 2013 22:47:51 GMT 8
How about a classic section for many of those who just got back into the game. Think it is still important to have a classic one too.
|
|
inherit
Wrestlemania Maineventer
170
0
Jul 9, 2017 1:55:02 GMT 8
41
ThE AuThORitY
708
Aug 20, 2011 22:15:23 GMT 8
August 2011
chrisl
|
Post by ThE AuThORitY on May 13, 2013 23:13:52 GMT 8
How about a classic section for many of those who just got back into the game. Think it is still important to have a classic one too. Agree bro !
|
|
inherit
Xiao Yuan~~~
321
0
Jan 31, 2013 7:38:11 GMT 8
9
LordFa9
I miss the days when a man's word was his unbreakable oath
768
Feb 29, 2012 15:23:44 GMT 8
February 2012
lordfa9
|
Post by LordFa9 on May 13, 2013 23:32:59 GMT 8
I don't mind pure non-virtual classic either. Or we can make it as our final non-virtual classic tourney to bring the chapter to a close and open up to a new full virtual environment. Although I had prefer to have a virtual tourney. Haha! This
|
|
inherit
601
0
Nov 2, 2016 21:52:13 GMT 8
26
J.C.
"I will give you a show that you have never ever seen before..why?...Because I can." Shawn Michaels
607
Dec 19, 2012 3:53:34 GMT 8
December 2012
josephclifford
|
Post by J.C. on May 13, 2013 23:53:01 GMT 8
Hahaa! Okok! But it should not be the last non-virtual classic one!! Classic one should still be around always. So when the old timers come back at least we will always have a platform to bridge them over. The very foundation of the game! Haha. Yeah. Especially those who don't even know backlash as we try to continue keep the game and community alive!
|
|
inherit
The Hipster of Hipster
266
0
1
Jun 6, 2022 17:51:57 GMT 8
91
DebuRaito
Royal Rumble 2018
450
Jan 7, 2012 22:21:48 GMT 8
January 2012
deburaito
|
Post by DebuRaito on May 14, 2013 0:17:31 GMT 8
There is no harm introducing old timers or newbies in to virtual directly. I myself started Raw Deal during the velocity expansion and I picked up Backlash deck immediately without going through the premiere classic 60 card deck vs 60 card deck era. Teaching them virtual directly helps them learn the meta game earlier. What most old timer or newbies has to overcome is their lack of knowledge for the new cards. But if you look at it in another way, if someone came back after he stopped playing before ss2, it's not like you would make him feel more comfortable by playing a chain deck yourself with all the cards after ss2 right? And I'm pretty sure you won't form a deck with only cards up to the velocity expansion just to make him more at ease. So why not teach him the virtual sets along with other expansion's cards from ss2 onwards?
But of course I have no objections with anyone playing non-virtual classic, just that tourney is more of a one for all, all for one thing (at least to me it is). Asking a virtual environment to play only non-virtual classic in a tourney is like asking someone who has every single card from premiere to gab to form a deck with only cards up to the mania expansion for a tourney.
|
|
inherit
559
0
Jan 8, 2016 22:33:16 GMT 8
12
bloop26
First tourney win 25/05/13 :P
288
Oct 4, 2012 9:04:53 GMT 8
October 2012
bloop26
|
Post by bloop26 on May 14, 2013 0:58:07 GMT 8
Asking a virtual environment to play only non-virtual classic in a tourney is like asking someone who has every single card from premiere to gab to form a deck with only cards up to the mania expansion for a tourney. i would agree with this fully although i myself am not familiar with all the virtual cards too
|
|
inherit
648
0
Sept 25, 2014 23:49:18 GMT 8
3
j0sa1ac
80
Mar 5, 2013 12:24:40 GMT 8
March 2013
j0sa1ac
|
Post by j0sa1ac on May 14, 2013 1:49:32 GMT 8
Any harm doing both(virtual+classic & classic) on the same day simultaneously? If you asked me now, I'd rather play it in the classic format. This only has to do with my familiarity with the "newly" introduced cards. I can totally imagine myself asking a million questions about your cards and what they do when you play with players new to virtual like me. And certain questions may tip the player about maybe what reversals he has, what cards he's about to play etc.
I personally do not mind the virtual format, though I haven't played it before. The card types and areas are most if not all the same(especially when only the superstar-specs will be used).
No, I'm not expecting players that fully transitioned to the virtual format to modify all their decks just to entertain classic players, but wouldn't it be good to play full classic decks just for fun.
I myself think the virtual cards are really cool, and infact I'll be printing some within these few days to go with the times, but old is gold... I'm sure most of us play many versions of CS and have our own favourite.
Cheers, whatever you guys decide, I'm good with it.
|
|
inherit
Xiao Yuan~~~
321
0
Jan 31, 2013 7:38:11 GMT 8
9
LordFa9
I miss the days when a man's word was his unbreakable oath
768
Feb 29, 2012 15:23:44 GMT 8
February 2012
lordfa9
|
Post by LordFa9 on May 14, 2013 10:15:45 GMT 8
Asking a virtual environment to play only non-virtual classic in a tourney is like asking someone who has every single card from premiere to gab to form a deck with only cards up to the mania expansion for a tourney. I'm sure those SMU regulars will have some decklists of their old classic decks (especally since that is what they have been playing for almost 2 years, surely thats is a lot of potential decks) and to ask them to spend 1 hour to reform their old deck to play for one last time? On hand I can easily pull out my old Jamie Noble, Teddy Long or Victoria, thats already 3 decks in my 1 year since comeback and I'm sure those that have been playing from allanglorious time should have more. Its not like I'm asking you to go dig out your Neckbreaker, Headlock Takedown and Kick (Non TB) for a mania only tourney right? No, I'm not expecting players that fully transitioned to the virtual format to modify all their decks just to entertain classic players, but wouldn't it be good to play full classic decks just for fun. that is why after every expansion "release" there will be a time period where its not tourney legal, to let people get used to the cards. Any harm doing both(virtual+classic & classic) on the same day simultaneously? . how do you want to do that? Have both tourney simultaneously: Ended up each tourney have only like 6 people Have one after the other: We stay until 12am also cannot finish, and each tourney will have 8 people because some only join they format they want to play, and some drop out because they tired
|
|
inherit
559
0
Jan 8, 2016 22:33:16 GMT 8
12
bloop26
First tourney win 25/05/13 :P
288
Oct 4, 2012 9:04:53 GMT 8
October 2012
bloop26
|
Post by bloop26 on May 14, 2013 10:34:54 GMT 8
Any harm doing both(virtual+classic & classic) on the same day simultaneously? . how do you want to do that? Have both tourney simultaneously: Ended up each tourney have only like 6 people Have one after the other: We stay until 12am also cannot finish, and each tourney will have 8 people because some only join they format they want to play, and some drop out because they tired[/quote] i would say classic on friday and virtual classic on sat? so then ppl can join both? then those newer guys who wanna play virtual classic can join the comp on sat or they could just come down and watch and have the usual play session? idk haha, a lot more work lol
|
|